• UGM
  • IT Center
Universitas Gadjah Mada Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH)
Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Tentang Kami
    • Visi & Misi
    • Sejarah
    • Staf dan Afiliasi
      • Pimpinan
      • SDM
      • Kolaborator Nasional
      • Kolaborator Internasional
  • Berita & Acara
    • Acara Mendatang
  • Briefings & Publikasi
    • Journal Article
    • Book Chapter
    • Teaching Module
    • Project Report
    • Others
  • Riset & Projek
  • Pendidikan & Kursus
    • Magister Bioetika
    • Kursus
  • Bioethics Teacher
  • Kegiatan
    • Program Rutin
    • Konsultasi Klinis
  • IBHC 2024
  • UNESCO Chair on Bioethics
  • Karir
  • Beranda
  • Raboan
  • Medical Dispute Dynamics (Raboan Discussion Forum)

Medical Dispute Dynamics (Raboan Discussion Forum)

  • Raboan, Uncategorized, Video
  • 23 June 2021, 17.03
  • Oleh: alifianuurma
  • 0

Weekly discussion forum, Raboan Online, held by Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanity (CBMH) on Wednesday (14/07) invited Indonesia Vice Minister of Law and Human Rights, Prof. Dr. Edward O.S. Hiariej, S.H., M.Hum., as a speaker on a discussion about Medical Dispute Dynamics, with dr. Darwito, Sp.B(K)-Onk, S.H., accompanying as moderator.

Medical dispute is a dispute between two or more parties about a law incident that is happening on a medical setting, one example being a malpractice.

According to the speaker who is familiarly known as Prof. Eddy, malpractice from the eyes of a law expert could be different from the medical perspective, where there are elements that should be fulfilled for a case to be judged as a malpractice. Prof. Eddy proceeded to emphasize that even then, a jurist can not decide the occurrence of a malpractice without the help of internal investigation by professional organizations of doctors themselves.

 

 

A few theory were explained further by Prof. Eddy regarding the elements of malpractice, before he then got to the focus of his presentation, which was “why in medical dispute it has to be restorative justice?”

That in the practice of restorative justice, an investigation of malpractice is held with the intention not to punish a doctor or a medical personnel, but to prevent similar incidents to happen in the future, was one of the point that was highlighted by Prof. Eddy.

 

Watch full video here

Tags: bioetika sengketa medis

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Berita lainnya

  • kuliah tamu harvard center for bioethics ke UGM CBMH UGM dan Departemen Psikiatri UGM Gelar Kuliah Tamu dan Diskusi Bersama Harvard Medical School: Menelisik Masa Lalu, Kini, dan Masa Depan Psikiatri dan Kesehatan Mental
    July 7, 2025
  • Ratusan Suku, Ratusan Nilai: Menggali Bioetika Asli Indonesia
    July 1, 2025
  • HELP COURSE BIOETIKA HUMANIORA MEDICAL ETHICS HELP Batch 7 – 2nd Series: Meneguhkan Etika Medis dalam Praktik Kesehatan Indonesia
    June 30, 2025
  • Saatnya BPJS Lebih Adil: Menyoroti Ketimpangan dan Mencari Solusi
    June 19, 2025
  • “Tayang Dulu, Dipecat Kemudian?” Belajar dari Kasus Medsos Nakes: Etika, Reputasi, dan Marketing Rumah Sakit
    June 16, 2025
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Penelitian dan Pengembangan FKKMK UGM Lt. 1 Sayap Utara

0274 547489
cbmhfkugm@ugm.ac.id

© Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY

[EN] We use cookies to help our viewer get the best experience on our website. -- [ID] Kami menggunakan cookie untuk membantu pengunjung kami mendapatkan pengalaman terbaik di situs web kami.I Agree / Saya Setuju