• UGM
  • IT Center
Universitas Gadjah Mada Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH)
Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Tentang Kami
    • Visi & Misi
    • Sejarah
    • Staf dan Afiliasi
      • Pimpinan
      • SDM
      • Kolaborator Nasional
      • Kolaborator Internasional
  • Berita & Acara
    • Acara Mendatang
  • Briefings & Publikasi
    • Journal Article
    • Book Chapter
    • Teaching Module
    • Project Report
    • Others
  • Riset & Projek
  • Pendidikan & Kursus
    • Magister Bioetika
    • Kursus
  • Bioethics Teacher
  • Kegiatan
    • Program Rutin
    • Konsultasi Klinis
  • IBHC 2024
  • UNESCO Chair on Bioethics
  • Karir
  • Beranda
  • Raboan
  • Medical Dispute Dynamics (Raboan Discussion Forum)

Medical Dispute Dynamics (Raboan Discussion Forum)

  • Raboan, Uncategorized, Video
  • 23 June 2021, 17.03
  • Oleh: alifianuurma
  • 0

Weekly discussion forum, Raboan Online, held by Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanity (CBMH) on Wednesday (14/07) invited Indonesia Vice Minister of Law and Human Rights, Prof. Dr. Edward O.S. Hiariej, S.H., M.Hum., as a speaker on a discussion about Medical Dispute Dynamics, with dr. Darwito, Sp.B(K)-Onk, S.H., accompanying as moderator.

Medical dispute is a dispute between two or more parties about a law incident that is happening on a medical setting, one example being a malpractice.

According to the speaker who is familiarly known as Prof. Eddy, malpractice from the eyes of a law expert could be different from the medical perspective, where there are elements that should be fulfilled for a case to be judged as a malpractice. Prof. Eddy proceeded to emphasize that even then, a jurist can not decide the occurrence of a malpractice without the help of internal investigation by professional organizations of doctors themselves.

 

 

A few theory were explained further by Prof. Eddy regarding the elements of malpractice, before he then got to the focus of his presentation, which was “why in medical dispute it has to be restorative justice?”

That in the practice of restorative justice, an investigation of malpractice is held with the intention not to punish a doctor or a medical personnel, but to prevent similar incidents to happen in the future, was one of the point that was highlighted by Prof. Eddy.

 

Watch full video here

Tags: bioetika sengketa medis

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Berita lainnya

  • Childfree dibenarkan dalam Pandangan Etis? Diskusi Raboan CBMH FK-KMK UGM Angkat Topik Childfree dan Pilihan Reproduksi
    May 8, 2025
  • BIOETIKA HUMANIORA MEDICAL ETHICS Kata ‘Maaf’ Bisa Bikin Kacau? Tantangan Utama Komunikasi dalam Interprofessional Collaboration di Dunia Kesehatan
    April 24, 2025
  • Perlukah Imunisasi pada Bayi?
    April 22, 2025
  • kursus bioetika help batch 7 seri 1 Membangun Pemahaman Etika, Kemanusiaan, Hukum, dan Profesionalisme dalam Dunia Kesehatan Melalui Kursus Bioetika HELP Angkatan 7 Seri 1
    April 9, 2025
  • Komunikasi Kesehatan dan Tantangan Etika: Membangun Dialog yang Bertanggung Jawab
    March 21, 2025
Berita Selengkapnya
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Gedung Penelitian dan Pengembangan FKKMK UGM Lt. 1 Sayap Utara

0274 547489
cbmhfkugm@ugm.ac.id

© Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities Universitas Gadjah Mada

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY

[EN] We use cookies to help our viewer get the best experience on our website. -- [ID] Kami menggunakan cookie untuk membantu pengunjung kami mendapatkan pengalaman terbaik di situs web kami.I Agree / Saya Setuju