Wednesday (05/02), Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH FK-KMK UGM) held the weekly routine program Raboan Discussion Forum for the first week of January 2022. The theme on the occasion was Implementation of Informed Consent on Complementary & Alternative Medicine (CAM) and Homeopathic Services. The virtual discussion forum presented by speakers Desy Putri Ratnasari, M.Sc., Bioethics Masters Study Program Alumni and UGM CBMH Research Assistant. Meanwhile, the moderator is dr. Nur Aziz Mahadinata.
bioetika
The Raboan Discussion Forum was again held by the Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities on Wednesday (08/12). This raboan theme continues the previous discussion regarding Health Law, namely Data Privacy in Health Services which was presented by Dr. Abdul Rasyid Thalib, S.H., M.Hum as chairman of the Indonesian Health Law Society, Central Sulawesi. Meanwhile, the moderator of the discussion forum is dr. Nur Azid Mahadinata.
Technological developments bring challenges to Health data protection. This makes the regulation of personal data protection an urgent matter today.
Yogyakarta – Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH FK-KMK UGM) bersama dengan Program Studi Magister Bioetika Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM menggelar webinar dengan tema “Aspek Etika dan Hukum Kebijakan Monoloyalitas”. Acara yang diselenggarakan secara daring tersebut dibagi menjadi dua hari yaitu Jumat (3/12) dan Senin (6/12). Ratusan peserta dari berbagai kalangan seperti Dokter, Manajemen Rumah Sakit, hingga Mahasiswa Kesehatan berkumpul dalam Zoom Meeting sore hari itu. Webinar ini juga sekaligus menjadi Open House Program Studi Magister Bioetika UGM yang sedang membuka pendaftaran mahasiswa baru 2021/2022.
Center For Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH UGM) held the annual Raboan Discussion Forum. This week, Wednesday (01/12) the discussed topic is Health Law Literacy. The topic was presented by Dr. dr. Muji Iswanty, S.H., M,H., Sp.KK.,M.Kes from Universitas Hassanudin. She is also the head Masyarakat Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia Sulawesi Selatan. The discussion was conducted by dr. Nasrun S.H., M.Sc as moderator.
Dr. Muji revealed that nowadays some doctors and health service provider doesn’t follow the four bioethics principal which is beneficience, non maleficience, autonomy, and justice. This occurences often led to legal dispute between patients and doctors or health care providers.
Wednesday (24/11), Center For Bioethics and Medical Humanities held weekly Discussion Forum Raboan. CBMH UGM has brought a recent issue about ethics and health practice that is Deontology Aspect of P-Care Utilization in the First Healthcare Facility in Yogyakarta. This topic is presented by Zahwa Arsy Azzahra S.T., M.Sc. Also present as moderator is Puri Swastika GKD, SE, M.Sc.
According to Zahra, the use of Big Data in healthcare services has the potential to be misused. Based on Lenca’s research on Big Data, there is misuse potential in privacy and confidentiality, informed consent, Fairness, and Justice, etc.
Yogyakarta – Wednesday (10/11) Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities Universitas Gadjah Mada (CBMH UGM) held a Raboan discussion forum. CBMH UGM presented topic Pastoral Care for Terminal Disease Patients. This topic is carried by Imanuel Eko Anggun S., M.Sc who is an alumni of UGM Bioethics Masters Program. Meanwhile, the discussion forum was led by Puri Swastika GKD, SE, M.Sc as moderator.
Pastoral Care is a form of patient assistance that has long been applied in the health sector. However, in Indonesia, the service from the hospital is still not widely known by the patient and the patient’s family. According to Anggun’s research, there are still many patients who do not know or even hesitate to ask for spiritual assistance. As a result, this service does not run optimally in hospitals. Although spiritual assistance is needed especially for patients with severe disease or terminal illness.
Yogyakarta – Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities (CBMH UGM) held the Raboan discussion forum on Wednesday (03/11). This regular discussion forum raised an interesting theme Human Rights and the Perspective of the Qur’an.
CBMH collaborated with Center for Religious and Cross-cultural Studies (CRCS UIN Sunan Kalijaga) and invited Prof. Syafaatun Almirzanah Ph.D, a professor in the field of Islamic Studies and the head of CRCS UIN Sunan Kalijaga as a speaker. Meanwhile dr. Nur Azid Mahadinata acts as a moderator who guides the discussion.
Raboan Discussion Forum on Wednesday, 13 October 2021 was presented by two excellent collaborator of Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities UGM: Prof. dr. Zabidi Hussin and Asocc. Prof. dr. Teguh Haryo Sasongko, Ph.D. Prof. Zabidi is a Pro-Vice Chancellor and Professor of Paediatrics at International Medical University, Malaysia. In this Raboan he told his own experiences on managing a patient with metachromatic leukodystrophy that has been written in a book titled perilous genes. Asocc. Prof. dr. Teguh Haryo Sasongko, Ph.D, Deputy Director of Center for Research Excellence, Perdana University later gave the medical explanation about the disease from the pathogenesis until the treatment options. This event was moderated by dr. Rusdy Ghazali Malueka, Sp.S(K), Ph.D from Neurology Department Sardjito General Hospital – FMPHN UGM.
Weekly discussion forum, Raboan Online, held by Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanity (CBMH) on Wednesday (14/07) invited Indonesia Vice Minister of Law and Human Rights, Prof. Dr. Edward O.S. Hiariej, S.H., M.Hum., as a speaker on a discussion about Medical Dispute Dynamics, with dr. Darwito, Sp.B(K)-Onk, S.H., accompanying as moderator.
Medical dispute is a dispute between two or more parties about a law incident that is happening on a medical setting, one example being a malpractice.
According to the speaker who is familiarly known as Prof. Eddy, malpractice from the eyes of a law expert could be different from the medical perspective, where there are elements that should be fulfilled for a case to be judged as a malpractice. Prof. Eddy proceeded to emphasize that even then, a jurist can not decide the occurrence of a malpractice without the help of internal investigation by professional organizations of doctors themselves.